My New Column in Huffington Post today

This one start’s out fast and light – about lousy headline writing – and gets a bit dense with trademark and a corporate conflict. Let me know what you think.

Screen Shot 2014-10-31 at 5.26.13 PM

How the Gawkering of a Headline Ate a New York Times Story

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

New Higher Education Website from My Company

The latest website (and responsive mobile site) created with the Buzzr Higher Education Edition CMS went live today — the very attractive http://www.paloaltou.edu/ for Palo Alto University.

Palo Alto University Website

The site was built in collaboration with mStoner, the design and strategy lead. mStoner also built the companion site, http://gc.edcms.net/, for the university’s counseling and psychotherapy center.

More details to follow on the feature set and the inside story of this fantastic new website.

Leave a comment

Filed under Buzzr, Drupal, website design

Wikipedia Entry on Social Journalism

Just contributed the post below, explaining social journalism, to Wikipedia. Let’s see if it survives their ruthless editing and deletion process.  As one of my suggestions for social journalism is the deletion of weak content, it would be suitably ironic if this fate befalls the entry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Journalism

Social Journalism

Social Journalism is a media model consisting of a hybrid of professional journalism, contributor and reader content.[1] It is similar to open publishing platforms, like Twitter and WordPress.com, except that some or most content is also created and/or screened by professional journalists. Examples include Forbes.com, Medium, BuzzFeed and Gawker. The model, which in some instances has generated monthly audiences in the tens of millions, has been discussed as one way for professional journalism to thrive.[2]

Writing in Re/Code, Jonathan Glick, CEO of Sulia, said the model of publishers as platforms (which he calls a “platisher”) is “on the rise.” Glick cites as examples Medium (from Twitter co-founders Ev Williams and Biz Stone), Vox Media, Sulia, Skift, First Look Media (backed by Ebay founder Pierre Omidyar) and BuzzFeed.[3]

In an interview in the New York Times, the editor of the Guardian, Alan Rusbridger, said the Guardian was in the process of converting into a platform as well as a publisher. “For years, news organizations had a quasi monopoly on information simply because we had the means of distribution. I think if as a journalist you are not intensely curious about what has been created by people who are not journalists, then you’re missing out on a lot,” he said.[4]

On April 1, 2014, in a column in GigOm entitled “Social journalism and open platforms are the new normal — now we have to make them work” Mathew Ingram asked “How can media entities take advantage of this phenomenon without losing their way in the process?” and proceeded to review suggested rules for social journalism proposed by former FastCompany.com president Ed Sussman, an early adopter of the model.[5] Ingram summarized Sussman’s suggestions, including clear labeling types of contributors (e.g. staff, guest contributor, reader contribution); establishing guidelines, such as conflict of interest rules, that posters must consent to before posting; providing wiki-like tools for social improvements to content; elevating the best content with curators and algorithms; deleting weak or problematic content via curators or algorithms.[6]

Social journalism has been attacked by media critic Michael Wolff in U.S.A. today as the “Forbes vanity model letting ‘contributors’ write whatever they want under your brand (‘as I wrote in Forbes …’) and not having to pay them anything — ultimately, of course, devaluing your authority.” [7]

In a March 20, 2014 Op Ed for the New York Observer, former FastCompany.com president Ed Sussman argued that social journalism does not devalue the authority of brands and that the success of Forbes.com in attracting a wide audience with its 1,000+ bloggers proved that the model could be successful for traditional media companies.[8] Following revelations that some Forbes.com contributors used their columns to allegedly participate in a “pump and dump” scheme to promote, then sell stocks, Sussman followed up with “The New Rules of Social Journalism: A Proposal” in Pando Daily, on March 29, 2014. Sussman proposed various rules for elevating the quality and ethics of social journalism content.[9]

An early, or perhaps the first “social journalism” platform] at a major media company was FastCompany.com, in 2008.[10] After the platform launched, in its first six months, FastCompany.com signed up 2,000 bloggers and 50,000 members.[11] “Fast Company is the first, but certainly not last, mainstream publication to integrate the majority of their site as a social community,” wrote media analyst Jeremiah Owyang in 2008, then a senior social computing analyst for Forrester Research.[12] After Ed Sussman left the website, the Fast Company print magazine editors reverted it to a standard journalism website.[13]

Image

Leave a comment

Filed under journalism, Media, online communities

Social journalism and open platforms are the new normal — now we have to make them work

Ed Sussman:

Matthew Ingram of Giga Om picks up on my piece in Pando on social journalism.

Originally posted on Gigaom:

What happens when everyone has the ability to publish? One thing that happens is the traditional media industry loses much of its power, over both the content that people read and the advertising that helps support it — but the other thing that happens is a profusion of content of all kinds, from “citizen journalists” to brands and advocacy groups and everything in between. How can media entities take advantage of this phenomenon without losing their way in the process?

In a nutshell, that’s the dilemma that Ed Sussman tackles in a recent post on Pando. Sussman, CEO of a site called Buzzr, is a former president at FastCompany magazine who helped turn that company’s website into an early hybrid of publisher and platform — or what Jonathan Glick of Sulia has referred to as a “platisher” (a horrible-sounding term that I sincerely hope will never catch on).

As Sussman…

View original 813 more words

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

New column on Pando: “New Rules of Social Journalism.”

The New Rules of Social Journalism: A Proposal
by Ed Sussman

Follow up to the Observer piece called “Why Michael Wolff Is Wrong: Social Journalism Doesn’t Devalue Brands.”

Screen Shot 2014-03-29 at 7.57.26 PM

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Marc Andreessen re-tweeted me…

Marc Andreessen re-tweeted my piece about social journalism in the NY Observer;  Tim O’Reilly and Nick Bilton favorites.  The Op Ed describes old media vs. new media perspective on social content.  http://observer.com/2014/03/why-michael-wolff-is-wrong/

I have to admit, I like rejoining the media-world conversation. Hard-core technology talk is not as much fun.

Image

Image

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 6.23.55 PM

Nick Bilton Favorite of Ed Sussman Op Ed tweet

Leave a comment

March 21, 2014 · 11:00 pm

My Op Ed in New York Observer

Called “Why Michael Wolff Is Wrong” it addresses social journalism, the Forbes contributor model and the march of new media into hybrid journalism/contributor platforms as most of legacy media stands by. http://bit.ly/OAXj6J

Running in third slide rotation on top of homepage. Cool.

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 4.40.35 PM

Leave a comment

Filed under journalism, Media, online communities, Uncategorized